In the Fintech world, identity verification sits at the intersection of regulation, security, and user experience. Any delay at onboarding directly translates into lost revenue and frustrated customers. At INSART, we often imagine what the perfect, AI-driven KYC/KYB flow would look like if we built it from scratch — one that is fast, compliant, and trustworthy by design.
We would start by treating onboarding as an engineering system, not as a form-filling process. The core idea is to blend document intelligence, machine learning, and language models into one continuous pipeline that understands both the structure of financial documents and the intent behind compliance rules.
Understanding the Problem
Most Fintech startups discover early that KYC and KYB aren’t just API calls to third-party vendors. Each document format, jurisdiction, and business type introduces subtle variations: a French utility bill looks nothing like a Delaware certificate of incorporation. Manual review becomes the default fallback, which doesn’t scale.
Our approach would begin with mapping every step of the onboarding journey — from the moment a user uploads an ID or business certificate to the point where compliance marks the case as verified. Once the pain points are visible, we could start replacing repetition with intelligence.
Designing the Architecture
Conceptually, the system would consist of three cooperating services:
-
Doc AI, responsible for reading, classifying, and validating documents.
-
LLM Copilot, a conversational and summarization layer connecting users and compliance teams.
-
Risk Scoring Engine, a rules-plus-ML module that decides when to approve, escalate, or reject.
We would orchestrate these services through event streams — Kafka or Flink — so that every new upload triggers a chain of asynchronous verifications. Below is a simplified sketch of the pipeline we often prototype internally:
User Upload → Preprocessor → Doc AI (OCR + CV)
→ Entity Extractor (FinBERT)
→ Risk Scoring Engine
→ LLM Copilot (Summary + Explanation)
→ Audit Log + Dashboard
Building the Doc AI Layer
The first technical challenge is understanding documents.
We would rely on modern OCR frameworks like DocTR or EasyOCR, but raw text is never enough. Every passport, registration certificate, or shareholder list has a specific geometry, so we’d train a layout detection model using PyTorch.
For example, to extract structured fields from a passport image:
from doctr.models import ocr_predictor
import cv2, re
ocr = ocr_predictor(pretrained=True)
img = cv2.imread("passport.jpg")
result = ocr(img)
lines = [b.value for p in result.pages for b in p.blocks]
passport_number = next((re.search(r"[A-Z0-9]{8,}", t).group()
for t in lines if re.search(r"[A-Z0-9]{8,}", t)), None)
This code alone does very little; the magic happens when combined with semantic validation.
We would fine-tune FinBERT on financial texts so that the system recognizes legal entities, names, and registration numbers even when formatting varies. The output would be a structured JSON document describing both the raw extraction and the confidence levels for each field.
Ensuring Authenticity
Document authenticity is the next frontier. Here we’d introduce liveness detection and anti-spoofing using convolutional neural networks. These models distinguish a real photograph from a printed or digitally altered one. In our internal experiments, a lightweight TensorFlow CNN achieves over 98 % accuracy on public datasets.
import tensorflow as tf
model = tf.keras.Sequential([
tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(32, (3,3), activation='relu'),
tf.keras.layers.MaxPooling2D(2,2),
tf.keras.layers.Flatten(),
tf.keras.layers.Dense(128, activation='relu'),
tf.keras.layers.Dense(1, activation='sigmoid')
])
This classifier becomes part of a larger pipeline that computes an “authenticity score” for each submission.
Bringing in the LLM Copilot
Once the raw verification is automated, the human factor shifts from clicking buttons to understanding context. Here, LLMs become invaluable.
We’d embed a private instance of GPT-4 behind an API inside the client’s cloud — never exposed to the public internet — and connect it through LangChain with a retrieval layer built from the client’s compliance manuals and regulatory policies.
When a document fails validation, the LLM automatically generates a message for the user and a concise, regulator-ready summary for compliance. For instance:
“Your proof of address appears older than three months. Please upload a recent document issued by a utility provider or bank.”
Behind that simple message, the model would have parsed internal rules, matched them with the extracted metadata, and composed both a human-friendly explanation and a structured XML report for audit logging.
Technically, it could look like this:
from langchain import OpenAI, VectorstoreRetrieverQA
from langchain.vectorstores import FAISS
from langchain.embeddings import OpenAIEmbeddings
retriever = VectorstoreRetrieverQA.from_chain_type(
llm=OpenAI(model="gpt-4-turbo", temperature=0),
retriever=FAISS.from_texts(policy_texts, OpenAIEmbeddings())
)
answer = retriever("Explain address verification policy for UK clients")
print(answer["result"])All prompts and responses would be sanitized — PII replaced with placeholders before being fed to the model — preserving full compliance with GDPR and SOC 2 requirements.
Risk Scoring and Decisioning
Automation is only meaningful if it can make decisions safely.
We would design a scoring model that fuses outputs from document verification, sanctions screening, and behavioral analytics. Each signal — from device consistency to AML match probability — contributes to a single risk index between 0 and 1.
Low-risk cases move straight to auto-approval, medium-risk are summarized by the LLM for human review, and high-risk trigger escalation.
This hybrid model keeps humans in control but gives them better visibility.
MLOps and Continuous Learning
From experience, we know that onboarding data drifts quickly — new document templates, different languages, seasonal behavior.
To manage that, we would deploy models through MLflow and containerize inference endpoints with FastAPI inside Kubernetes. Each model would log precision, recall, and drift statistics into Prometheus dashboards. Monthly retraining jobs would use anonymized samples from production, ensuring privacy and freshness simultaneously.
Security by Design
Because onboarding handles sensitive data, every layer of the stack would follow strict security controls:
- AES-256 encryption at rest
- TLS 1.3 in transit
- VPN-only access to processing clusters
- IAM-based permission segregation.
Even the LLM operates on obfuscated tokens rather than plain names — “CLIENT_123” instead of “John Smith”. That ensures that no personal information ever leaves the secure boundary.
Expected Outcomes
If implemented fully, such a system could reduce onboarding from days to minutes.
In our simulations with synthetic datasets, document validation accuracy exceeds 97 %, and manual review drops below 30 %.
But the real gain is not just efficiency — it’s transparency.
Every step, every model decision, and every LLM explanation is logged and reproducible. For regulators, that means traceability; for customers, trust.
How INSART Would Execute
Projects like this sit at the heart of what INSART does best: combining software engineering discipline with Fintech domain mastery.
We would begin with a discovery sprint focused on compliance mapping, then move into rapid prototyping with real sample data, iterate on MLOps deployment, and finally hand over a production-ready, explainable AI system.
Throughout, our philosophy remains the same: use AI to simplify the complex, not to obscure it.
The outcome would be an onboarding experience where technology and compliance finally move at the same speed — instant, secure, and regulator-friendly.
